What Producers Actually Look For in New Work

What Producers Actually Look For in New Work

One of the biggest mistakes I see many playwrights and musical theatre writers make is believing producers are looking for “good writing.”

Of course they are.

But, after years of producing, directing, dramaturging, and sitting through countless readings, festivals, workshops, and development processes, I can tell you that “good writing” is not the whole conversation.

I’ve seen beautifully written plays stall for years.

I’ve also seen less-than-perfect scripts move forward really quickly (to my surprise).

Why?

Because producers never evaluate scripts in isolation.

Instead, they evaluate projects – and how current audiences would receive them.

That’s a very different thing.

When writers send out a script, they want to know:

“Is this good? What do you think?”

But producers are asking themselves a whole different set of questions.

  • Can I build a team around this?
  • Does it have an audience?
  • Would a regional theatre want it?
  • Can I see a path from where it is now to a complete production?

The longer I work in theatre, the more I realize that many writers have simply never been taught how the industry evaluates new work.

So – let’s pull back the curtain a little.

Below are some of the things I know many producers pay attention to.

Producers Look for Projects They Can Get Behind

That may sound obvious, but hear me out.

Producers don’t wake up in the morning wondering how many scripts they’re going to reject that day.

They look for projects they can say yes to. Something they can get excited about.

It’s true – everyone’s looking for the next Hamilton.

We dream of finding a script we can spend the next several years of their life fighting for.

The question isn’t just:

“Is this script good?”

It’s:

“Am I passionate about this project? Do I love it?”

Because producing is a lot of fighting.

  • Fighting for funding.
  • Fighting for attention.
  • Fighting for audiences.
  • Fighting for opportunities.

The projects that actually move forward are often the ones that inspire people to advocate for them, for the long term.

 

We Look for an Audience

This is the place where many writers get uncomfortable.

The moment someone mentions “audience,” some artists hear the word “commercial.”

That’s not what I’m talking about.

Every successful production has an audience.

Even the most experimental play downtown has an audience.

The question is whether anyone knows who that audience is.

Some writers spend years refining a script without ever thinking about who would actually buy a ticket.

Eventually somebody has to ask that question.

Usually it’s the producer.

Submit your script accordingly.

 

Producers Look for a Story That Generates Momentum

A lot of scripts have interesting ideas, and compelling themes.

A lot of librettos have beautiful, well-produced demos.

What they don’t always have is momentum.

What keeps the audience leaning forward?

What creates anticipation?

What makes us eager to know what happens next? Or care?

I’ve sat through readings where everyone thought a script had good things going on, but nobody could figure out where the action was actually going. Or maybe scenes were overwritten, or there was too much “dead space” where the audience disconnected.

That’s a development issue.

And that’s also a reason projects stall.

 

We Look for Characters We Want to Spend Time With

I don’t necessarily mean likable characters.

I mean compelling characters.

When actors get excited about a project, it’s usually because they see a role they can’t wait to play.

When directors get excited, it’s often because they see relationships they want to explore.

When audiences connect, it’s because they recognize something human.

Strong characters create advocates.

Advocates create momentum.

Momentum creates opportunities.

 

We Look for Writers Who Can Develop Work

This is a big one.

Sometimes the question isn’t whether the script is ready.

It’s whether the writer is ready.

You see, theatre is the most collaborative art.

Development is collaborative.

Productions are collaborative.

The writers who move forward are not necessarily the writers who get every note right.

They’re the writers who know how to engage in the process.

They listen.

They evaluate.

They experiment.

They revise.

They don’t necessarily take every note, but they keep an open mind and are willing to try things.

They understand that a reading isn’t the finish line.

It’s information.

The script is no longer just their baby – it’s the team’s.

 

Producers Look for a Path Forward

More than anything else, what I’ve learned from years of working in New York is that projects rarely move forward because someone suddenly “discovers” them.

Most projects move forward because someone can see the next step. And the next one after that.

  • Maybe it’s a reading.
  • Maybe it’s a workshop.
  • Maybe it’s a development lab.
  • Maybe it’s a festival.
  • Maybe it’s a producing partner.

The question isn’t always:

“Can this be produced tomorrow?”

The question is:

“Can I see what the next step is?”

The projects that generate momentum usually have a visible path forward.

 

The Real Question

When writers ask me what producers are looking for, I think they’re often just asking the wrong question.

A better question is:

“What makes someone want to champion my work?”

Because that’s what ultimately moves projects forward.

Not perfection.

Not credentials.

Not winning lots of awards.

Not doing another reading.

Advocates.

People who believe in your project enough to invest their time, energy, relationships, and resources into helping it grow.

That’s why development matters.

The goal isn’t simply to write a good play or musical.

The goal is to develop a project that artists, audiences, and industry professionals can believe in.

That’s when things start moving.

And that’s when the real work begins.

 

Most playwrights and musical theatre writers have spent years learning how to write.

Few have been taught how the industry actually evaluates new work.

 

If you’re serious about getting your work onstage, explore our programs.

Why So Many Workshops Fail Writers

Why So Many Workshops Fail Writers

One of the hardest conversations I have with playwrights and musical theater writers is this:

A workshop does not always advance development.

And development does not automatically lead to a production.

I’ve seen writers spend thousands of dollars and years of their lives moving from workshop to workshop, reading to reading, note session to note session—without ever getting a production.

The problem isn’t workshops.

The problem is using the wrong workshop without defining the right purpose.

Let’s define a few terms.

Table Readings & Industry Readings

The value of these depends almost entirely on two things:

  1. The experience of the creative team facilitating the process.
  2. The quality of the invited audience.

A room full of experienced directors, dramaturgs, producers, literary managers, actors, and theatergoers can provide valuable information.

A room full of friends and family may provide encouragement—but not necessarily the developmental insights you need.

Playwriting Workshops

These vary dramatically.

The quality depends on:

  • The professional experience of the instructor.
  • Their ability to develop work for production, not simply teach writing theory.
  • The experience and seriousness of the other participants.

A workshop led by someone who has never developed work professionally will produce very different outcomes than one led by someone actively producing and developing new plays and musicals.

Regional Development Programs

These vary based on the goals for the workshop.

Some are designed to help writers improve craft.

Some are designed to identify projects for future production.

Some are designed primarily as community engagement programs.

Those are very different objectives.

The mistake writers make is assuming every workshop serves the same purpose – to move your show toward a production.

They don’t.

Let’s strategize a developmental plan instead.

How to Make a Workshop Actually Move Your Project Forward

1. Define the developmental goal.

What is your goal for the workshop?

Structure?
Character?
Pacing?
Marketability?
Audience engagement?
Building a team?
Finding producers?

Don’t hold a reading just because “it’s time.”

2. Create an overall strategy.

What is your path from this workshop to a full production?

If you don’t plan the next step, you’re likely collecting feedback instead of creating momentum.

3. Build an audience before the reading.

Development isn’t just about improving the script.

It’s about finding the people who care about the script, resonate with your ideas and can advocate for your work.

Start building those relationships now.

4. Build a fan base, not just a feedback list.

Future ticket buyers, advocates, donors, producers, and supporters often begin as audience members.

Capture names. Follow up. Stay connected.

5. Decide whose feedback matters most.

Not all notes are equal.

Pay attention to who is speaking and what expertise they bring to the conversation.

6. Measure outcomes, not attendance.

A packed room means nothing if you leave without actionable insights, “testimonials” and at least one meaningful connection.

7. Look for patterns, not opinions.

One note is an opinion.

Ten versions of the same note are data.

Look for the same feedback wrapped in different phrasing.

8. Record audience reactions.

Laughter, silence, confusion, engagement, applause—these often tell you more than a post-show discussion.

9. Leave with a revision plan.

Before the workshop ends, identify the three biggest issues you’ll tackle next.

Do it immediately – because I guarantee you’ll forget something.

10. Set a production target.

A workshop should be a step toward something.

A festival.
A developmental production.
A regional premiere.
A commercial production.

Never Plan a Workshop – Plan a Strategy

Without a destination, workshops can become a permanent holding pattern.

The goal isn’t to have more readings.

The goal is to create a producible play or musical.

Those are very different things.

How many workshops has your current project had—and do you know exactly what each one was supposed to accomplish?

Readings Aren’t the Goal. Development is.

Readings Aren’t the Goal. Development is.

Readings Aren’t the Goal. Production Is.

Why so many playwrights get stuck in the development loop—and how to avoid it.

By Cate Cammarata

If you’re writing a new play or musical, at some point you’re going to need to put it in front of an audience.

There is simply no substitute for hearing actors speak your words out loud, seeing where an audience leans in, where they laugh, where they become restless, and where they become emotionally invested.

We need to bring an audience in to learn how the work is landing. That’s why we do readings.

Theaters and producers also need to hear information a script before they invest all the time, money, and resources required to move the script to a full production.

Readings are one of the most useful, economical and practical tools we have in the development process.

I am very much for readings.

But I think our industry has developed a problem.

Too many writers have grown to believe that development itself is the destination.

But it’s not.

Too many projects spend years moving from reading to reading, workshop to workshop, feedback session to feedback session—without ever reaching a production.

And that was never the purpose.

 

A Reading Is a Diagnostic Tool

Think of a reading the way a doctor thinks about an X-ray.

The X-ray isn’t the treatment.

It’s information.

The reading is not the final product.

It’s a way to discover:

  • What is working

  • What is confusing

  • What is emotionally landing

  • Where the pace drags.

  • What questions the audience is left asking it’s done.

The goal is not to accumulate readings.

The goal is to gather information on what should be addressed and revised in order to move the piece forward.

But if a project has had five readings and nothing significant is being changed – the work needs to find a way to a full production.

So then, is the work ready? It depends. What does the feedback actually say?

 

Not All Feedback Is Equal

One of the most important lessons I teach playwrights and musical theatre writers is this:

Always pay attention to who is giving the feedback.

Many writers collect comments from everyone in the room and treat every opinion as equally valuable.

Watch out; that could be dangerous.

Consider:

  • Is the feedback coming from a producer?

  • A literary manager?

  • A dramaturg?

  • A director?

  • An actor?

  • A regular audience member?

Each person is experiencing the work through a different lens:

  • A literary manager may identify issues that affect programming decisions.

  • A ldirector may focus on theatrical execution.

  • An actor may notice problems with character motivation.

An audience member may only know that something “felt off.”

All of those perspectives have value.

But they do not necessarily carry equal weight depending on your goals.

The key is to understand the source before deciding what to do with the information.

 

Listen for Patterns

One isolated comment is just one person’s opinion.

Ten versions of the same comment are data.

One person might say:

“Act Two felt slow.”

Another would admit:

“I lost focus after intermission.”

Someone trying to be helpful would share:

“I wasn’t sure what the protagonist wanted anymore.”

Or add:

“The ending felt farther away than I expected.”

Different words – but the same underlying issue.

When multiple people are pointing toward the same problem—even if they’re describing it differently—the audience is intuiting something important.

That doesn’t automatically mean they know how to fix it (although they may try to rewrite your play on the spot to “help”).

But it usually means they’re correctly identifying a symptom.

Your job is to investigate the cause.

 

The Audience Is Usually Right About Problems

And usually wrong about solutions.

Remember that.

An audience member may accurately identify confusion around a character’s motivation – and then they may propose a scene, a speech, or an entirely new subplot to fix it.

Now, the confusion is valuable information.

Their proposed solution? Not so much.

As the writer, your responsibility is to diagnose the underlying issue and solve it in a way that serves the piece.

 

Trust Your Instincts

No matter how experienced the person giving notes may be, never make a change simply because someone told you to. No matter how famous.

Every revision should pass through your own artistic judgment.

Ask yourself:

  • Does this note resonate to me?

  • Does it reveal a real problem?

  • Does it align with my vision for the piece?

  • Will it make the play stronger?

If the answer is no, don’t make the change.

The work belongs to you. The final decisions belong to you.

A professional writer learns how to listen productively without becoming obsessed by other people’s opinions.

Process every comment through your own filter: your own gut reaction to it.

 

Remember: It’s Your Intellectual Property

This is especially important when production opportunities enter the picture.

Sometimes a theatre, director, producer, or literary manager may request changes before agreeing to produce a script.

Those requests may be reasonable.

They may even lead to improvements.

Or – they may not.

Writers often feel trapped in these situations because production opportunities can be difficult to secure.

Unfortunatlely, I’ve seen it happen too many times.

Here’s what I remind my clients:

The work is your intellectual property.

If you choose to make adjustments to facilitate a production, that is your decision.

But the script remains yours.

You are not permanently surrendering authorship.

After the production ends, you are free to decide which – if any – of those changes belong in future drafts.

The work is yours..

The key is making intentional choices for now instead of feeling pressured into introducing permanent changes into your script. 

 

We Need Better Development Models

The larger issue is that our field often relies too heavily on readings as the primary development mechanism.

Readings are valuable.

They’re essential.

But they’re not enough.

Theatre is a production-based art form.

Certain discoveries only emerge when a piece is staged, designed, rehearsed, and performed in front of a paying audience over time.

The challenge, of course, is cost.

Productions require resources.

Readings are comparatively inexpensive, which is why many promising projects remain trapped in “developmental hell.”

As an industry, we need more innovative, practical, and sustainable ways to move readings into productions.

We need models that allow artists to test work in front of audiences in spaces that don’t require enormous budgets.

We need pathways that help writers move beyond endless feedback cycles and toward actual production experiences.

Those questions—and the future of developing theatre—are topics I explore regularly in my Creative Producer emails each Friday.

Because the goal isn’t another reading.

The goal is helping great plays and musicals find their way to the stage.


About CreateTheater

At CreateTheater, we help playwrights and musical theatre writers develop producible work—not just polished scripts. Through dramaturgy, development labs, strategic feedback, and production-focused guidance, we help writers move from draft to audience to production with intention.

Development is a step. Production is the destination.

Want more practical strategies for moving plays and musicals from development to production?

Every Friday, I share my Creative Producer newsletter with playwrights, musical theater writers, directors, and independent producers exploring new models for developing and producing work.

Join the list and receive weekly insights on script development, audience-building, production strategy, and creating sustainable pathways to the stage.

Why Most Theater Projects Stall

Why Most Theater Projects Stall

 

Why Most Theater Projects Stall

 

Most theater projects do not stall because the work isn’t good.

They stall because development is so difficult to sustain.

A playwright begins with excitement.
A composer starts hearing the score.
A collaborative team gathers around an idea that feels urgent and alive.

Then, slowly, the momentum fades.

The reading happens.
Feedback comes in.
People say encouraging things.

And then…

Nothing.

No next step.
No developmental strategy.
No producing support.
No sustained artistic ecosystem to mentor the work forward.

The project enters the place where many promising theater works disappear:
developmental limbo.

 

The Isolation Problem

Many writers spend years developing work in isolation.

Not because they want to — but because the structure of the contemporary theater industry often leaves them there.

Theater is inherently collaborative, but development has increasingly become private.

Writers revise alone.
Submit alone.
Network alone.
Attempt to produce alone.

Without sustained collaboration, it becomes difficult to maintain clarity about the work itself.

Questions begin to accumulate:

  • Is this working?
  • What audience is this really for?
  • What changes should I make?
  • Is the problem structural or is it something else?
  • Is this project producible?
  • Should I keep going with this project?

Without artistic guidance, revisions can become circular rather than forward-moving.

Many writers are not actually revising the script anymore.
They are revising to please someone else.

 

Feedback Is Not the Same Thing as Development

One of the biggest misconceptions in new work creation is the idea that feedback alone = development.

But receiving opinions is not the same thing as building a show.

A playwright may receive:

  • script notes
  • workshop responses
  • reactions from peers
  • coverage
  • dramaturgical comments

But unless someone is helping shape a long-term developmental process, the work can still stall.

Real development requires:

  • continuity
  • momentum
  • leadership
  • collaboration
  • producing awareness
  • audience understanding
  • artistic accountability

In other words:
development is not just about rewriting pages.

It is about sustaining movement.

 

Momentum Is the Most Important Resource

The greatest threat to new theatrical work is not failure.

It is inertia.

A project loses momentum when:

  • there are no deadlines
  • no collaborators
  • no producing pathway
  • no developmental milestones
  • no audience engagement
  • no ecosystem carrying the work forward

And momentum matters because theater is not created with just one one step.

The strongest projects evolve through sustained interaction between:

  • writers
  • directors
  • dramaturgs
  • performers
  • producers
  • audiences

Without movement, even strong projects begin to psychologically disappear for the artists creating them.

Theater history is filled with extraordinary unfinished, unproduced, or abandoned work — not because the stories lacked value, but because development requires infrastructure.

And infrastructure is expen$ive.

 

The Economics of Development

There are more good stories than the theater industry currently has the capacity to produce.

That is the reality every developmental company confronts.

The cost of producing theater right now – anywhere – is extraordinarily high.
Institutional risk is real.
Commercial production requires enormous capital.
Nonprofit theaters operate with limited resources and shrinking margins.

Which means many worthy projects never receive any sustained developmental investment.

This is why artistic support matters so deeply.

Not every project will receive a full production immediately.

But every artist deserves:

  • serious development
  • collaboration
  • momentum
  • community
  • producing literacy
  • audience connection
  • a pathway forward

 

What Development Could Be

At its best, theatrical development is not simply script improvement.

It is the creation of conditions where artists and projects can continue evolving toward audiences.

That requires more than workshops.

It requires sustained ecosystems supporting new theatre.

Spaces where:

  • writers build long-term relationships
  • producers engage early
  • dramaturgy provides strategy
  • projects are developed sustainably
  • momentum is protected
  • artists are not isolated

This is our philosophy behind CreateTheater’s development programs.

We believe new work deserves:

  • sustained artistic support
  • collaborative infrastructure
  • dramaturgical guidance
  • producing insight
  • and meaningful pathways toward presentation

Because while not every project can immediately move to full production, every serious artist deserves the opportunity to continue growing their work in community.

 

Developing the Work in Community

Theater does not move forward in isolation, alone.

It moves forward through sustained development, collaboration, and momentum.

At CreateTheater we’re working toward helping develop the work and then, when it’s ready, creating the pathways forward. Collaboratively.

At CreateTheater, we believe development should lead somewhere.

Our flagship programs are built around long-term artistic growth, dramaturgical support, and industry presentations & productions.

This month, we’re launching:

The 12-Month Musical Writing Lab

The 12-Month NYC Producer Lab

The Off-Broadway Producer Intensive

If you’re ready to move your project forward, make sure you sign up before the end of June.

Stay in the loop with our upcoming workshops!
If Your Play Isn’t Moving Forward, Read This

If Your Play Isn’t Moving Forward, Read This

If Your Play Isn’t Moving Forward, Read This

There’s a moment almost every playwright hits.

You’ve revised the script.
You’ve gotten feedback.
Maybe you’ve even done a reading.

And then…

Nothing.

No momentum.
No next step.
No production.
No real traction.

So you start wondering if the problem is the industry.
Or the timing.
Or whether theater is just impossible right now.

But after years working with new plays and musicals in New York, I can tell you something difficult — and liberating:

Most scripts don’t stall because the writer isn’t talented.

They stall because the work isn’t yet producible.

And those are two very different things.

A lot of writers are creating plays as literary documents.

But theater isn’t literature.

Theater is a live event that requires:
actors,
directors,
designers,
producers,
money,
space,
audience buy-in,
and a reason to exist right now.

That doesn’t mean your work has to be commercial.
It doesn’t mean it has to be safe.
And it definitely doesn’t mean you should write to trends.

But it does mean your script has to understand the realities of production.

Can a director envision this onstage?
Can actors emotionally land inside it?
Can an audience track the dramatic engine?
Does the structure create momentum?
Does the play know what experience it’s trying to create in the room?

These are producing questions.
And they are creative questions.

I think this is the missing conversation in a lot of playwright education.

Writers are taught how to write scenes.
But not how to build theatrical experiences people want to champion.

And honestly?
That’s where careers begin to shift.

Because once your work becomes producible, people can suddenly move with it.

Producers lean in.
Directors see possibilities.
Collaborators want to attach themselves.
Readings lead to workshops.
Workshops lead to productions.

Momentum becomes easier because the work itself generates momentum.

This week, I’m teaching a free webinar called Write a Producible Play because I think too many talented writers are stuck in development limbo without understanding why.

We’re going to talk about:

  • why some plays move forward while others stall
  • the structural mistakes that quietly kill momentum
  • how producers evaluate new work
  • and how to develop your script with production in mind without sacrificing your artistic voice

Because your play does not need to become smaller.

It needs to become stage-ready.

And those are not the same thing.

If your work has felt stuck lately, this webinar is for you.

Let’s get your play moving again.

If this opened your eyes to how producers actually evaluate your script…

Then you’ll want to be in the room for our live training:

Write a Producible Play Webinar on May 30th

 Off-Broadway Producer Patrick Blake and I will walk you through exactly how to check your work so it’s not just compelling, but something a producer can get on board with.

Stay in the loop with our upcoming workshops!